Status

In January, the Carson National Forest released their Travel Management "proposed action," or plan for managing off road vehicles. Comments were due March 20, 2009.  A coalition of groups in New Mexico submitted comments asking for more protection of water, streams, habitat and quite recreation opportunities.  Please check back for updates.  We will notify you when the Carson releases the environmental assessment and alternatives

Action

If you missed the March 20th deadline, it isn’t too late!  You can still send a letter to the Carson National Forest expressing your concerns about off-road vehicle misuse and the need to protect the forest for quiet recreation such as hiking and birdwatching. Let the forest know that species protection must come before destructive recreational needs. Consider sending a copy of your comments to the Center for Biological Diversity. Contact Amigos Bravos or the Center to learn more and to get involved.

Forest Service Contact

Steve Okamoto, Forest Engineer
208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571
575-758-6370
sokomato@fs.fed.us

Organizations Involved

Amigos Bravos

Center for Biological Diversity

WildEarth Guardians

Updated by Cyndi Tuell on 3/30/09

To Top ^

Cibola Forest Travel Planning

Status

Ranger Districts are at different stages on this forest:

1. The Mountain Air Ranger District has just begun their travel planning process. The district says they can only afford to maintain 9% of their current road system and they are proposing to reduce routes open to the public significantly, resulting in a responsible, manageable road system.  This is an ideal time to speak to the Forest Service and ask for them to identify their minimum road system, keep user-created routes out of the plan, and emphasize the need to protect species habitat and wild places for future generations. Contact Roxanne Turley, Mountainair Travel Management Project Team Leader, at (505) 346-3900 or rturley@fs.fed.us. You can visit the Cibola’s website for more information, click here.
2. The Mt. Taylor proposed action was released in October 2008. The Center for Biological Diversity along with local New Mexican conservation organizations submitted comments asking the Forest Service to protect forest resources by designating a travel system they can afford to maintain and keep user-created routes off the maps. We expect to see the environmental assessment in August of 2009. You can contact Arnold Wilson, the Travel Mangement Team Leader for the Mt. Taylor Ranger District, for more information: awilson01@fs.fed.us, 505-287-8833.
3. Black Kettle and McClellan Creek have both published their Motor Vehicle Use Maps.
4. Sandia released its decision for off-road vehicle use in July 2008. The area north of I-40 is protected from the ravages of off-road vehicle use, but south of I-40 remains a network of trails designated for motorcycle and ORV use. Unfortunately, there will not be trails designated only for hiking or quiet recreation. The Decision Notice for this plan was signed late in 2008.
5. Kiowa, Rita Blanca, and Magdalena are in a holding pattern for now.  Please check back for updates.

Forest Service Contact

Nancy Brunswick, IDT Leader
2113 Osuna Road NE, Suite A
Albuquerque, NM 87113
505-281-3304
mebean@fs.fed.us

Organizations Involved

Center for Biological Diversity

New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

WildEarth Guardians

Updated 3/30/09

To Top ^

Gila Forest Travel Planning

Status

The Gila National Forest are held a series of meetings to present the maps that outline their draft plan to decide which routes, trails and areas will be open to motorized use and off-road vehicles in late 2008. We expect the Gila to release another draft proposal early in 2009 and we will post that document here when it is released. We encourage you to help safeguard this New Mexican treasure by contacting the forest to ask for a plan that prioritizes the protection of wildlife and their homes and our lands for quiet recreation. We are especially concerned about the San Francisco and Gila River corridors, which should remain off-limits to off-road vehicles. See photos at the San Francisco/Blue River website (large pdf file with 30 photos).

The Forest Service now plans to develop an Environmental Impact Statement following the comment period on the Proposed Action. The Center for Biological Diversity and the Upper Gila Watershed Alliance had repeatedly asked the Forest Service to prepare this detailed and informative document. It is because of your actions and the actions of other citizens in New Mexico that the Gila will more fully consider the environmental impacts of off-road recreation in this fragile ecosystem. THANK YOU!

Action

Check the Gila website often and attend public meeting when they occur. We are especially concerned about the Wilderness, Quemado and Reserve Ranger districts. Plan to attend and make comments at the public meetings that will follow the release of the final proposed action. If you know of specific trails or roads that are eroded, causing damage to the environment, or where quiet users are being driven away, please contact the Center or Upper Gila Watershed Alliance.

Forest Service Contact

Lisa Mizuno
NEPA Coordinator
3005 E. Camino del Bosque, Silver City, NM 88061
575-388-8257
lmizuno@fs.fed.us

Organizations Involved

Center for Biological Diversity

New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

Upper Gila Watershed Alliance

Updated 3/30/09

To Top ^

Lincoln Forest Travel Planning

Status

The Proposed Action should be released in the summer of 2009, with a 30 day comment period. Please stay tuned for your opportunity to help protect species such as the Sacramento Mountains checkerspot butterfly.

Action

While the Lincoln is developing their Proposed Action, you can let them know you want quiet recreation and wild places protected in the forest. Call, email, or write to the Lincoln and ask them to reduce route densities throughout the forest. The Lincoln can only afford to maintain 9% of their current motorized travel system. Let them know that it is irresponsible of them to consider adding motorized routes until they can afford to maintain their current road system. Write letters to the editor of your local papers discussing the negative impacts ORVs are having on your forest experience and quiet enjoyment.

Forest Service Contact

Connie Zipperer, Project Team Leader
Federal Building
1101 New York Avenue, Alamogordo, NM 88310
505/434-7200
LNFtravel@fs.fed.us

Organizations Involved

Center for Biological Diversity

Wildearth Guardians

New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

Updated 3/30/09

To Top ^

Santa Fe Forest Travel Planning

Status

The Proposed Action was released in July 2008. The proposal is a good first step towards protecting habitat and quiet areas of the forest, but we still have a long way to go to fully protect the forest. Hundreds of miles of user-created routes are included in the plan which does little to protect the forest and serves to reward illegal behavior. One of the goals of travel management planning is to encourage off-road vehicle users to comply with the new rules, but rewarding them for breaking the rules is no way to encourage responsible behavior. We have noticed a sharp increase in the motorized communities' interest in this forest and they have recently swarmed the Forest Service with emails and comments on the proposed plan. We need to do the same – let the Forest Service know that you value quiet places, wildlife habitat, and riparian areas that are not destroyed by off-road vehicle users.

Action

It is not too late to contact the Santa Fe National Forest. The official comment period expired September 2nd, 2008, but the forest continues to accept comments. You can send comments to comments-southwestern-santafe@fs.fed.us.

Check the Forest Service website for information on how to submit comments. If you need assistance with comment letters, please contact the Center for Biological Diversity. We still need local residents to send letters to the editor of your local paper letting the public know how important quiet, healthy forests are to you and your community. Please encourage your local papers to write about off-road vehicle damage in the forest and the need to finally rein in the damaging activity. Contact one of the organizations listed below to find out how you can be most helpful in sharing local input and concerns.

Forest Service Contact

Julie Bain
1474 Rodeo Road, Santa Fe, NM 87502
505 438–7829
sftravelmgt@fs.fed.us

Organizations Involved

Center for Biological Diversity

Wildearth Guardians

New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

Sierra Club

Glorieta Mesa Organization

Save la Cueva organization

Santa Fe Watershed Watch

Updated 3/30/09

To Top ^

Off-road vehicles have the following negative environmental impacts:

Land

• Soil erosion.
• Invasion of exotic and noxious weeds.
• Soil compaction.
• Crushed vegetation.
• Exposed roots.

Wildlife

• Fragmented habitat.
• Destroyed habitat.
• Road kill.
• Increased disturbance and stress.

Aquatic Areas

• Increased sediment and cloudiness.
• Damaged critical and often rare habitat.
• Altered water flow patterns.

Other

• Disruption of quiet enjoyment of forest.
• Damaged archaeological sites.
• Intrusions into sensitive areas.

To Top ^

To Top ^

The US Forest Service has a nationwide effort underway to establish designated routes for motorized vehicles in national forests. This process was initiated by Forest Service Chief, Dale Bosworth, who identified a rampant increase in Off Road Vehicle usage, creation of new routes and consequent damage to the forest as one of the four biggest problems facing the national forests.

If you would like to represent conservation interests as an Off-Road Vehicle Reform Advocate, please call or email Cyndi Tuell, Public Lands Advocate (520/623-5252 ext. 308, ctuell@biologicaldiversity.org). More information is available at www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/travel- management_planning/index.html.

By Cyndi Tuell, Center for Biological Diversity

A History of Abuse and Neglect

Over the past 30 years, motorized recreation and cross-country travel on national forests has increased dramatically, resulting in unprecedented damage to valuable natural resources and increasing conflicts among other forest users. As off-road technology has increased, along with the number of off-road enthusiasts, so have the negative impacts to our public lands. A lack of regulation and enforcement resulted in a nationwide network of unauthorized, user created roads and trails created with no regard for the environmental damage being caused. Human safety, wildlife preservation, and concern for fellow forest users has taken a back seat to the need for speed and adrenaline.

To Top ^

In 2004, Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth identified unmanaged off-road vehicle recreation as one of the four key threats to national forests. (The four key threats: (a) fire and fuels, (b) invasive species, (c) loss of open space, and (d) unmanaged recreation.) Thus began the process of managing travel in forests throughout the nation.

In 2005, the Forest Service released a rule governing the use of off-road vehicles and prohibiting cross-country travel. This rare and long overdue opportunity for the Forest Service to finally curb one of the most destructive uses of public lands is also a chance to remedy decades of damage and prevent further destruction.

Under the rule, known as the Travel Management Rule, national forests, with public input, will first analyze the current situation on the ground and determine the minimum road system necessary to manage the forests. Areas, roads and trails suitable for off-road vehicle use will be identified through this process.

To Top ^

The opportunities for public involvement are great and the off-road vehicle community is taking full advantage of this process. It is critical that those of us concerned about protecting natural resources, including threatened and endangered species, fully participate in the public process to ensure those values we hold dear are protected. The implementation of the Travel Management Rule will determine whether past damage is mitigated and further damage prevented. We must compel the Forest Service to use the best science available to protect threatened and endangered species and follow the laws already in place protecting wilderness and roadless areas. The protection of wildlife and the preservation of wild places will take community involvement and dedication.

National Forests belong to all of us, not just those who live near the forests or those who make the most noise and cause the most destruction. It is time to get involved, take action, and protect our nation’s heritage.

To Top ^

The Law

Executive Order 11644. Issued by President Nixon in 1972. The EO requires federal public land agencies to designate specific areas and trails on which off-road vehicles may be allowed, and where they are prohibited. The designation of specific areas and trails must consider the protection of natural resources, promote the safety of all users, and minimize conflicts among users. Public land managers are required to minimize impacts to soil, watersheds, vegetation and other public land resources, and minimize the harassment of wildlife. Areas and trails designated for off-road use cannot be located in officially designated Wilderness Areas or Primitive Areas. Agencies were directed to develop and publish regulations limiting off-road vehicle use within one year of the Executive Order.

Executive Order 11989. Issued by President Carter in 1977. President Carter amended EO 11644 to require that whenever an agency head determines that off-road vehicle use will cause or is causing considerable adverse effects to the soil, vegetation, wildlife, habitat, or cultural or historic resources of areas or trails, those areas close immediately to the type of off-road vehicle use causing those effects until those effects have been eliminated and future damage is prevented. This amendment also allowed agencies to close portions of public lands to use by off-road vehicles.

To Top ^

36 CFR 212 et seq. Adopted in 2005 by the Forest Service and known as the Travel Management Rule (TMR), requires local agencies, with public input, to designate areas, roads, or trails as open to off-road vehicle use. The agency must consider the minimization of conflicts among users and the compatibility of motor vehicle use with existing conditions in populated areas. Off-road vehicle use would not be prohibited on National Forest Service Lands under the rule. Revision of designations is permitted to allow for consideration of unforeseen environmental impacts and changes in public demand. Threatened and endangered species consideration take place at the local level as designations are determined. Importantly, while user-created routes are considered neither legal or illegal under the rule, they do not have the same status as Forest Service System roads and trails.

A complete road inventory is not required for implementation of the rule. The process has no deadline under the Code of Federal Regulations, but is to be completed “as quickly as possible.” Most forests plan to have the process completed by 2009. A route cannot be designated as open to off-road use until it 1) actually exists; 2) has been analyzed and evaluated, and 3) is available for public use. The rule also allows for the closure of old routes.

To Top ^

Areas designated as open for cross-country motorized use are not intended to be large or numerous, nor are they required at all under the rule.

The mechanism for enforcing the TMR is the development and publication of a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM), which must be made available to the public.

A future rulemaking by the Forest Service is anticipated to develop a standard for off-road vehicle noise levels.

The exemption for a road under RS 2477 has been removed from the definition of a road or trail under Forest Service jurisdiction under the rule. Temporary roads and trails should be maintained as temporary and are REQUIRED to be decommissioned. Motor vehicle use in Wilderness areas is prohibited except for administrative uses or if they are expressly authorized under individual statutes designating wilderness areas.

To Top ^

Exceptions to the ban on cross-country motorized travel. Forests may allow limited cross-country motorized travel, off designated routes, for dispersed camping and big game retrieval within specified distances of certain designated routes, and if appropriate within specified time periods.

Minimum Road System. Under the TMR, Forests are required to identify the minimum road system needed for safe and efficient travel and for administration, utilization, and protection of Forest Service Lands. The identification of this system must incorporate a science-based roads analysis at the “appropriate scale” and involve a broad spectrum of interested and affected citizens, agencies, and tribal governments. This minimum system is the road system determined to be needed to meet resource and other management objectives adopted in the relevant land and resource management plan (36 CFR 219. It must also reflect long-term funding expectations and ensure the minimization of adverse environmental impacts associated with road construction, reconstruction, decommissioning, and maintenance. Unneeded roads must be identified and considered for decommissioning or conversion to other uses, such as trails. Roads slated for decommissioning that pose the greatest threat to public safety or environmental degradation should be given priority.

To Top ^

Important Definitions.

• Designated road, trail, or area. A National Forest System road, a National Forest System trail, or an area on National Forest System lands that is designated for motor vehicle use pursuant to §212.51 on a motor vehicle use map.
• Forest road or trail. A road or trail wholly or partly within or adjacent to and serving the National Forest System that the Forest Service determines is necessary for the protection, administration, and utilization of the National Forest System and the use and development of its resources.
• Motor vehicle. Any vehicle which is self-propelled, other than: (1) A vehicle operated on rails; and (2) Any wheelchair or mobility device, including one that is battery-powered, that is designed solely for use by a mobility-impaired person for locomotion, and that is suitable for use in an indoor pedestrian area.
• Off-highway vehicle. Any motor vehicle designed for or capable of cross-country travel on or immediately over land, water, sand, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or other natural terrain.
• Road. A motor vehicle route over 50 inches wide, unless identified and managed as a trail. • Road Decommissioning. Activities that result in the stabilization and restoration of unneeded roads to a more natural state.
• Temporary road or trail. A road or trail necessary for emergency operations or authorized by contract, permit, lease, or other written authorization that is not a forest road or trail and that is not included in a forest transportation atlas.
• Unauthorized road or trail. A road or trail that is not a forest road or trail or a temporary road or trail and that is not included in a forest transportation atlas.

To Top ^

Region 3 Guidelines.

(Region 3 includes Arizona and New Mexico.) The purpose of the guidelines is to identify the tools available to meet public interest, consistent with the TMR, and to provide a level of consistency among the forests of Region 3. Designations of routes, trails and areas for motorized use in Region 3 should protect natural and cultural resources, enhance public enjoyment of the forest, promote the safety of all users, and minimize conflicts among users of the National Forest Lands.

Forest Service Units (Forests and Ranger Districts for example) should coordinate within states and among adjacent units to ensure consistency in designation that promotes public understanding, compliance and ease of enforcement.

The Forests must identify the “existing direction,” or the current system of trails, roads, and areas managed for motorized use plus any existing restrictions or closures. This existing direction comes from laws and regulations, official directives, Forest Plans, Forest Orders, Roads Analysis, and travel analysis. Other sources include visitor and travel management maps, Recreation Opportunity Guides, Infra (Infra includes National Forest System Roads and information about jurisdiction, route status and maintenance level 2-5.), and road and trail maintenance records. The existing direction does not prevent the Forest from designating as open roads, trails or areas that are not part of the current system, nor does it preclude the closure of such roads, trails or areas to motorized use.

To Top ^

Certain roads and trails should NOT be included in the existing direction. These include: roads or trails incorrectly coded in Infra and roads or trails that no longer exist on the ground but are included in Infra.

Designation of areas for motor vehicle use should be sparingly applied. Such areas should have biophysical characteristics that are suitable for such use or have been significantly altered by past actions so that such use might be appropriate. Where areas are designated, all of that area will be open to cross-country motorized travel. These areas should be clearly delineated on the ground where practical.

Dispersed Motorized Camping should not be allowed adjacent to routes where such use would create a public safety problem or where such use could increase the risk of adverse affects on adjacent lands. If natural or cultural resources would be adversely impacted, motorized camping should not be allowed. Forests may designate terminal facilities, trailheads, parking lots and turnouts, specific routes, roadside camping, areas for cross-country use, or fixed distances from designated routes to facilitate dispersed motorized camping. The designation of dispersed motorized camping areas should be applied carefully because of the potential for negative impacts to natural resources. The designation of fixed distances should be the choice of last resort and used sparingly to avoid undermining the purposes of the TMR.

To Top ^

Motorized Big Game Retrieval (MBGR) should be considered in collaboration with the responsible state agency. There will be no MBGR in Wilderness or Primitive Areas and should not be allowed where cross-country travel would cause unacceptable resource damage. Only those who have legally harvested and properly tagged an animal may travel cross-country on a motorized vehicle to retrieve big game. They should take a relatively direct and safe route that minimizes negative resource effects and should take the minimum number of trips necessary for retrieval. Only one vehicle should be allowed for cross-country MBGR per animal harvested. MBGR options should be prioritized as follows: 1. designation of routes open to all users; 2. designation of routes open only during hunting seasons to reduce the distance for non-motorized game retrieval; 3. allow cross-country MBGR. Cross-country MBGR is considered to meet state game harvest and management objectives, avoid spoilage of big game, and provide access to disabled hunters. Fixed distances are areas may be designated for cross-country MBGR.

For Arizona, Forests should additionally consider MBGR up to 3 miles from a designated route for bison, up to 1 mile for elk, and up to 1 mile for mule deer from July through the second week of October.

Permitted activities, such as grazing, Special Use Authorizations, Forestry Program activities, and gathering of forest products may qualify the holder of the permit for an exemption from the ban on cross-country motorized travel.

Requirements for operator qualifications and equipment are governed by state law.

To Top ^